Skip to content

SAT Math · Problem-Solving & Data Analysis · Free lesson

SAT Percentages: Multipliers, Reversals, and Stacked Discounts

Free SAT Percentages lesson: percent change as a multiplier, reversing an increase, and why stacked discounts never add up the way they look.

The opening of Mestria’s Percentages concept lesson. The full lesson, with checkpoints, interactive figures and the AI tutor, is in the app.

The core idea

Here is a result that trips up almost every test-taker: a price rises 25%, then falls 20%. What's the net change?

Zero. The price is exactly back where it started. That sounds like a coincidence — it isn't, and once you see the mechanism, you'll own every SAT percentage problem on the test.

A percent is not a fixed dollar amount. It's a fraction of whatever it's applied to. That "whatever" — the number you're taking the percent of — is called the base. Almost every wrong answer on SAT percentage questions comes from using the wrong base. The right answer always comes from asking two questions first:

What is the base? Am I going forward (base → result) or backward (result → base)?

Here's the reframe that makes all of this mechanical. When a price increases by p%p\%, you're not adding a fixed amount — you're scaling:

x+p100⋅x=(1+p100)xx + \frac{p}{100} \cdot x = \left(1 + \frac{p}{100}\right)x

So a 25% increase is the same as multiplying by 1.251.25. A 20% decrease is the same as multiplying by 0.800.80. These are your multipliers, and they're the engine of this whole topic.

  • Increase by p%p\% → multiply by (1+p100)\left(1 + \dfrac{p}{100}\right)
  • Decrease by p%p\% → multiply by (1−p100)\left(1 - \dfrac{p}{100}\right)

Now that opening puzzle makes sense: +25%+25\% then −20%-20\% is 1.25×0.80=1.001.25 \times 0.80 = 1.00. Exactly back to the start. Not a coincidence — the multipliers cancelled.

The key sentence of this lesson — the one worth writing on your hand before the test:

Going forward, multiply by the multiplier. Going backward, divide by it. Never subtract the percent from the result.


Worked examples

Example 1 — Forward: a straightforward discount

A jacket originally costs $80. It goes on sale at 25% off. What is the sale price?

The base is $80 — that's the original price, the number the 25% is measured against.

A 25% reduction means you keep 100%−25%=75%100\% - 25\% = 75\% of the original:

0.75×80=$600.75 \times 80 = \dollar 60

The sale price is $60.

You could instead compute the discount separately — 0.25×80=$200.25 \times 80 = \dollar 20 — then subtract: 80−20=6080 - 20 = 60. Same answer. But the two-step route has a trap built in: if you stop after finding $20, you've found the discount, not the price. The SAT puts $20 in the answer choices for exactly this reason. The multiplier route gets you to the final answer in one shot.


Example 2 — Percent change: which number goes on the bottom?

A plant grows from 20 inches to 25 inches over one month. By what percent did its height increase?

This type has one classic wrong answer baked in: 20%. Here's where it comes from — and why it's wrong.

The formula is:

Percent change=new−originaloriginal×100\text{Percent change} = \frac{\text{new} - \text{original}}{\text{original}} \times 100

The original always goes in the denominator. You're measuring how far you've traveled relative to where you started, not where you ended up.

25−2020×100=520×100=25%\frac{25 - 20}{20} \times 100 = \frac{5}{20} \times 100 = 25\%

The plant's height increased by 25%.

The wrong answer of 20% comes from dividing by 25 — the new height — instead of 20. It's tempting because 25 is right there in the problem. But ask yourself: 5 inches is what fraction of where you started? Twenty inches. The original is always the anchor.


Example 3 — Backward: recovering the original price

A gym membership costs $48 after a 20% increase. What was the original price?

This is where most points are lost. The tempting wrong move: subtract 20% from $48.

0.80×48=38.40←wrong0.80 \times 48 = 38.40 \quad \leftarrow \text{wrong}

Why is that wrong? Because the 20% was never taken off $48 — it was added to the original price. You'd only be justified in removing 20% from $48 if the 20% had been measured against $48, and it wasn't. That's the wrong base.

The right move: write one equation, then divide.

Let xx be the original price. A 20% increase means the new price is 120% of xx:

1.2x=481.2x = 48

x=481.2=$40x = \frac{48}{1.2} = \dollar 40

The original price was $40.

Check: 40+0.20(40)=40+8=4840 + 0.20(40) = 40 + 8 = 48. ✓

The same logic handles discounts. A different jacket's sale price is $48 after a 20% markdown. What was the original price?

A 20% markdown means the sale price is 80% of the original:

0.8p=480.8p = 48

p=480.8=$60p = \frac{48}{0.8} = \dollar 60

Check: 20%20\% of 6060 is 1212, and 60−12=4860 - 12 = 48. ✓

Notice the trap the SAT sets here: multiplying $48 by 1.2 gives $57.60 — this is the most common wrong answer. It would only be correct if the 20% had come off the sale price. It didn't. The 20% came off the original. One equation, then divide.


Example 4 — Successive changes: multiply the multipliers

A desk originally costs $60. Its price increases 25%, then decreases 20%. What is the final price?

Convert each change to a multiplier, then multiply:

60×1.25=75(after the increase)60 \times 1.25 = 75 \quad \text{(after the increase)}
75×0.80=60(after the decrease)75 \times 0.80 = 60 \quad \text{(after the decrease)}

The final price is $60 — exactly the original.

Or compose first: 1.25×0.80=1.001.25 \times 0.80 = 1.00, so the net multiplier is exactly 1. The two changes cancel perfectly.

This is why +25%+25\% then −20%-20\% nets to zero: the 20% comes off the already-inflated $75, removing $15, while the 25% only added $15 on top of $60. Equal dollar amounts, different percent labels — because the bases are different.

The rule: when you see back-to-back percent changes, multiply the multipliers. Never add the percents.

+10%+10\% then −10%-10\% is not 0%0\%. It's 1.10×0.90=0.991.10 \times 0.90 = 0.99 — a 1% net loss. The interactive below makes this visible:

For a nonzero pair of equal and opposite percentage changes within these sliders, the final amount is below the positive starting amount: (1+r)(1−r)=1−r2<1(1+r)(1-r)=1-r^2<1. If both changes are zero, it is unchanged. The base mismatch is built into the geometry.


Example 5 — Two-level percent: finding a count within a count

A school has 400 students. 30% belong to at least one club. Of those club members, 25% are in the debate club. How many students are in the debate club?

The trap here is reaching for 25% of 400. The problem says 25% of club members, not 25% of all students. Each percent has its own base.

Work in two steps, left to right:

Step 1: How many students are club members?

0.30×400=120 club members0.30 \times 400 = 120 \text{ club members}

Step 2: How many of those are in debate?

0.25×120=30 debate club members0.25 \times 120 = 30 \text{ debate club members}

The answer is 30.

If you want one calculation: compose the multipliers first, then apply to the total.

0.30×0.25=0.075⟹0.075×400=300.30 \times 0.25 = 0.075 \quad \Longrightarrow \quad 0.075 \times 400 = 30

Two traps to name, because they're both in the answer choices:

  • 0.25×400=1000.25 \times 400 = 100 — wrong base (25% of all students, not of club members)
  • (0.30+0.25)×400=220(0.30 + 0.25) \times 400 = 220 — adding percents instead of tracking bases

The discipline is simple: before you multiply any percent, write down what it's of.


Before harder practice

A percentage can change one factor in a product. If revenue equals price times quantity, a 15% price reduction and 20% increase in sales multiply revenue by 0.85(1.20)=1.020.85(1.20)=1.02: a 2% increase. Compare the final factor with 1 before reporting the percentage change.

For an unknown percentage, write its multiplier as an expression. A 10% increase followed by a decrease of 100r%100r\% that leaves 99% of the original gives 1.10(1−r)=0.991.10(1-r)=0.99. Thus 1−r=0.901-r=0.90 and r=0.10r=0.10: the decrease is 10%. For a reversed chain or subgroup count, divide the known final amount by the product of the relevant nonzero factors.

Mixed groups require a weighted total. Suppose 40% of people belong to one group, 25% of that group choose an option, and 34% of all people choose it. If fraction qq of the remaining people choose it, 0.40(0.25)+0.60q=0.340.40(0.25)+0.60q=0.34. Therefore q=0.40q=0.40, or 40% of the remaining group. The group share and the percentage within that group have different bases.

The paper prompts are self-study: nothing is submitted or recorded. Explain your reasoning, not just the answer.

All free SAT lessons →

Your next step

Keep learning with guidance.

In Mestria, explore concept lessons, ask for hints when you are stuck, and work through practice at your pace.

Join the waitlist

Opening by invitation from 15 November. We email you when it is your turn.

Access is free during the invitation phase. Making high-quality learning affordable is central to our mission. Pricing for broader access will be published before paid plans are introduced.

These public lessons are free to read without an account. Minors should use Mestria with a parent or teacher involved.